FIRST OF A READING OF THE LAW ON MURDER:
U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 51 § 1111
18 U.S. Code § 1111 - Murder
(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
Any other murder is murder in the second degree.
(b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,
Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life;
Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(c) For purposes of this section— (1) the term “assault” has the same meaning as given that term in section 113; (2) the term “child” means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years and is— (A) under the perpetrator’s care or control; or (B) at least six years younger than the perpetrator; (3) the term “child abuse” means intentionally or knowingly causing death or serious bodily injury to a child; (4) the term “pattern or practice of assault or torture” means assault or torture engaged in on at least two occasions; (5) the term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning set forth in section 1365; and (6) the term “torture” means conduct, whether or not committed under the color of law, that otherwise satisfies the definition set forth in section 2340(1).
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 756; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1004, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2138; Pub. L. 99–646, § 87(c)(4), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3623; Pub. L. 99–654, § 3(a)(4), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3663; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7025, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4397; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60003(a)(4), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1969; Pub. L. 108–21, title I, § 102, Apr. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 652.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 452, 454, 567 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§ 273, 275, 330, 35 Stat. 1143, 1152).
Section consolidates the punishment provision of sections 454 and 567 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with section 452 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The provision of said section 454 for the death penalty for first degree murder was consolidated with section 567 of said title 18, by adding the words “unless the jury qualifies its verdict by adding thereto ‘without capital punishment’ in which event he shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life”.
The punishment for second degree murder was changed and the phrase “for any term of years or for life” was substituted for the words “not less than ten years and may be imprisoned for life”. This change conforms to a uniform policy of omitting the minimum punishment.
Said section 567 was not included in section 2031 of this title since the rewritten punishment provision for rape removes the necessity for a qualified verdict.
The special maritime and territorial jurisdiction provision was added in view of definitive section 7 of this title.
Amendments
2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–21, § 102(1), inserted “child abuse,” after “or sexual abuse,” and “or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children;” after “robbery;”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–21, § 102(2), added subsec. (c).
1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322 amended second par. generally. Prior to amendment, second par. read as follows: “Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree, shall suffer death unless the jury qualifies its verdict by adding thereto ‘without capital punishment’, in which event he shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life;”.
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–690 inserted a comma after “arson”.
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646 and Pub. L. 99–654 amended subsec. (a) identically, substituting “aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse” for “, rape”.
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–473 inserted “escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage,” after “arson”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1986 Amendments
Amendments by Pub. L. 99–646 and Pub. L. 99–654 effective respectively 30 days after Nov. 10, 1986, and 30 days after Nov. 14, 1986, see section 87(e) of Pub. L. 99–646 and section 4 of Pub. L. 99–654, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2241 of this title.
NO ONE IN "LAW ENFORCEMENT" with enough Balls and Guts to enforce this LAW like they're supposed to by THE OATH they take. LEOS nationwide ought to be ashamed of themselves. Even Law Enforcement is GONE. Where's the Criminal Arrest of these Hospital Administrators, Owners, Boards of Directors Boards of Investors? WHERE?!
So worried about making REVENUE, that's where.
Apparently now Government Health "OFFICIALS", Law Enforcement, Hospital Administrators, Owners, Boards of Directors Boards of Investors, Big Pharma & BIG TECH ARE THE ONLY ONES that can get away with MURDER.
WHAT DARN "RULE OF LAW"?!
PEOPLE are dying, being killed by Hospital Administrators, Hospital Boards of Directors & Investors, Insurance Executives, and the NIH, CDC, FDA, and DEA upon the Direct Orders of one, Anthony Fauci. the CDC, NIH, Big Pharma, and Big-Tech are so worried about their precious Patents.
All these Patents need to be declared Null & Void and documents thereof both seized in the physical and digital, then destroyed. BIG TECH & BIG PHARMA needs to be told they SHALL NOT think nor believe, nor assert any such ownership of any Person, Individual, Human Being, Male, Female, Man, Woman, and Child. If they continue to think and believe, and assert this Dogma they will be rounded up - seized and then summarily committed to a Max Level Security Mental Health Institution for the rest of their Natural Lives. The 1st Amendment DOES NOT cover, grant, give, nor express said previous Freedom & Liberty of thought and belief. Everything previous shall be for all Hospitals, each Hospital Administration, Owners, Boards of Directors, and Boards of Investors; they SHALL NOT think nor believe, nor assert any such ownership of any Person, Individual, Human Being, Male, Female, Man, Woman, and Child. If they continue to think and believe, and assert this Dogma they will be rounded up - seized and then summarily committed to a Max Level Security Mental Health Institution for the rest of their Natural Lives. The 1st Amendment DOES NOT cover, grant, give, nor express said previous Freedom & Liberty of thought and belief.
A BAST FROM THE PAST NOW MAKES A SINISTER VISIT TODAY
Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the U.S. v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.
The Nuremberg Code (1947) Citation of Source: https://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ & BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
Cite as:
The Nuremberg Code (1947) In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Schuman, 1949: xxiii-xxv.
The International Military Tribunal (IMT) in the German city of Nuremberg, beginning on November 20, 1945. On trial were 24 of Nazi Germany's major war criminals, including Hermann Goering, Martin Bormann, Julius Streicher, and Albert Speer.
Nazi human experimentation
Nazi human experimentation was a series of medical experiments on large numbers of prisoners, including children, by Nazi Germany in its concentration camps in the early to mid 1940s, during World War II and the Holocaust.Chief target populations included Romani, Sinti, ethnic Poles, Soviet POWs, disabled Germans, and Jews from across Europe.. Nazi physicians and their assistants forced ... READ MORE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_human_experimentation
8 Worst Nazi Human Experiments You Never Knew About
Despite the obvious evils that Nazis inflicted on the world, behind closed doors doctors and scientists were conducting some of the most abhorrent and disturbing experiments on human subjects… READ MORE
https://www.topsecretwriters.com/2011/07/8-worst-nazi-human-experiments-you-never-knew-about/
WE ARE NOW A NATION, A COUNTRY IN DISTRESS!
WE ARE NOW A NATION, A COUNTRY WITHOUT RULE OF LAW!
WE ARE NOW A NATION, A COUNTRY OF LAWLESSNESS!
WE ARE A NATION, A COUNTRY WITHOUT REAL LAW ENFORCEMENT!
WE ARE A NATION, A COUNTRY, A REPUBLIC NO LONGER!
LEOS in Law Enforcement, I’m calling you all out to DO you Constitutional Duties and Sworn Oath and arrest those that are committing this Evil, this Murder, this Genocide.
Sincerely,
K. L. Cobb, Jr.
Founder & Chief
FEN: Free Eagle Network