JUDICIAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING
The Realities of Corruption (in all 50 States) Sat. Jan. 25, 2025 FEN/SOC
JUDICIAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING
The Realities of Corruption (in all 50 States)
Sat. Jan. 25, 2025
FEN Free Eagle Network w/ SOC Save Our Children
A History: Human Trafficking goes back to far ancient times of humanity. The practice of slave trading was its Genesis Point Rulers of territories, dynasties, and empires have engaged in the trafficking of people for personal gain. From the Middle East to Rome, to Africa, and to the Americas all have their footprints and fingerprints everywhere when it comes to Human Trafficking.
WHAT IS JUDICAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING?
Here in America, the United States of America there is a legal doctrine that is both used and misused, and abused. This legal doctrine is ‘Parens Patrai’ Parent of the Nation. Everything starts at the siring and conceiving of a child in and without marriage. The use of Marriage License and Birth Certificates is the main key of entry.
What is Parens patriae? Parens patriae is Latin for "parent of the nation". In law, it refers to the public policy power of the State to intervene against an abusive or negligent parent, legal guardian, or informal caretaker, and to act as the parent of any child, individual or animal who is in need of protection. Under parens patriae, a state or court has a paternal and protective role over its citizens or others subject to its jurisdiction. - Cornell Law
Parens patriae was later added to the Law under pressure form States seeking to gain custody and control over children (minors). ArtIII.S2.C1.6.6.3 States and Parens Patriae: Cornell Law
This is where CPS/CWS Child Protection Services/Child Welfare Services come into play and will become a hellish nightmare for any couple that eventually have children.
The Perils of “Parens Patriae” NOVEMBER 21, 2017 by by Rajan Bal bmc85
To learn more about the doctrine of parens patriae, check out The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997: A Collision of Parens Patriae and Parents’ Constitutional Rights, by Amy Wilkinson-Hagen, available on Westlaw and LexisNexis.
CAPTA adds to the misery Excerpt Pulled from above article: The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (“CAPTA”) was designed to help the government combat child abuse by funding state child protective services and by establishing incentives for states to encourage good faith reporting of child abuse. Since CAPTA incentivizes reports of suspected child abuse and offers prosecutorial immunity for people making a report of suspected child abuse who do so without intending to offer a false report, what child abuse actually is can fall by the wayside. In cases in which child abuse or neglect is not blatantly clear, child abuse cases would invariably be influenced by the subjective evaluation of the situation by the person reporting the child abuse and the person evaluating the report and whether the circumstances appear like child abuse to them.
Since states encourage individual parties to file reports, there is substantial over-reporting within child protective services. While the government should take each claim seriously due to its compelling interest in protecting children, individual states waste many resources by investigating unfounded reports and in doing so irreparably harm approximately 700,000 families.
Judicial human trafficking refers to the involvement or exploitation of judicial systems in human trafficking activities. This can manifest in various ways:
Corruption Within the Judiciary: Judges, lawyers, or other court officials might be bribed or otherwise coerced into making decisions that facilitate human trafficking. This could include decisions related to custody battles, immigration status, or sentencing that inadvertently or deliberately support trafficking networks.
Lack of Judicial Oversight: In some regions, there might be insufficient judicial scrutiny or enforcement of laws against human trafficking, allowing perpetrators to operate with relative impunity. This can be due to a lack of resources, corruption, or systemic issues within the legal system.
Misuse of Legal Systems: Traffickers might exploit legal loopholes or use the judicial system to legitimize their activities. For instance, they might use marriage or adoption laws to traffic individuals under the guise of legal processes.
Protection of Victims: Sometimes, the judicial system can play a protective role by ensuring that victims of trafficking receive justice, support, and protection. However, if the system is flawed, victims might be re-traumatized through judicial processes, or their cases might not be handled with the necessary sensitivity or urgency.
International Legal Challenges: Human trafficking often crosses international borders, complicating legal jurisdictions. The judicial systems of different countries might not cooperate effectively, or there might be discrepancies in how trafficking laws are enforced globally.
Legislation and Policy: The effectiveness of judicial action against human trafficking heavily depends on the existing laws and their implementation. Sometimes, laws might be outdated or not comprehensive enough to tackle modern forms of trafficking, or there might be challenges in prosecuting cases due to evidential requirements or victim protection concerns.
Addressing judicial human trafficking involves:
Reform and Vigilance: Ensuring judicial systems are transparent, accountable, and free from corruption.
Training and Education: Educating legal professionals about human trafficking signs, legal tools, and the rights of victims.
International Cooperation: Enhancing cross-border judicial cooperation to tackle trafficking networks that operate internationally.
Victim Support Services: Providing adequate support for victims within the judicial process to encourage reporting and prosecution.
Legislative Updates: Continuously updating laws to close loopholes that traffickers might exploit.
One woman in particular led the charge to see changes in the system until her death.
(NANCY SMITH SCHAEFER 28TH of JUNE 1936-26TH of MARCH 2010 A.D.)
She exposes Judicial Human Trafficking and Corrupt Family Courts and the entire Judiciary in all States in all Jurisdictions. She exposes CPS-Child Protection Services also known as CWS Child Welfare Services, and DCPS-Department of Child Protective Services. She exposes how the Judiciaries in all 50 States bankrupt parents into compliance and forced into admission of guilt. She also exposes how court administered psychologist are used to support CPS in every way against the parents no matter legitimately guilty or not. NOTE: Each State Legislature and State Attorney Generals nationwide uses MAXIMUS, INC to fund and administer the system of funding. Accountability is nowhere to be found in the Judiciary nationwide. The Federal Government i.e. Congress nor the federal judiciary cares because they are engaged in Criminal Felony Malfeasance at least. Ms. Schaefer fought tirelessly until her death to Save Our Children.
Read More About Her: Written by
founder of SOC Save Our Children.
Corrupt family courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) have been subjects of significant scrutiny and criticism, often linked to allegations of misconduct, bias, and systemic issues. Here's an overview based on common discussions and concerns:
Allegations Against Family Courts:
Bias and Prejudice: Some claim that judges in family courts can exhibit bias towards one parent over another, often influenced by gender stereotypes or personal biases, which can affect custody decisions.
Financial Incentives: There are allegations that family courts might have financial incentives to prolong cases, such as through child support arrangements or legal fees, potentially leading to decisions that keep cases open longer than necessary.
Lack of Due Process: Critics argue that parents sometimes face decisions without adequate legal representation or without full access to due process, especially when CPS is involved.
Secrecy and Lack of Transparency: Family court proceedings are often closed to the public, which can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in how cases are handled.
Allegations Against CPS:
Overreach and Misconduct: Some reports suggest that CPS might overstep its bounds, removing children from homes without sufficient cause or evidence of imminent danger.
Incentive for Adoptions: There's a narrative that CPS might push for adoptions to gain federal funding, leading to children being unnecessarily removed from their families.
Neglect of Genuine Cases: While there might be overzealous interventions, there are also claims that CPS neglects or inadequately investigates genuine cases of abuse or neglect due to understaffing or incompetence.
Lack of Accountability: There's concern over the lack of accountability for CPS workers when mistakes or false allegations lead to family separation.
Specific Issues:
Human Trafficking Allegations: Some extreme allegations suggest that CPS and family courts could be complicit in human trafficking scenarios, where children are placed in foster care or with potentially harmful individuals due to systemic corruption or oversight failures.
Parental Rights: The balance between child protection and parental rights is often debated, with some arguing that the rights of parents are frequently overlooked or violated.
Reform and Advocacy:
Calls for Oversight: There are numerous petitions, organizations, and activists advocating for more oversight, reform, and accountability in both family courts and CPS operations.
Legal and Policy Changes: Some advocate for changes in law to mandate better practices, like requiring jury trials in certain custody cases, ensuring all evidence is presented, and opening family court proceedings to public scrutiny where appropriate.
Training and Resources: Improving the training of CPS workers and judges, providing more resources to handle cases appropriately, and ensuring better checks and balances within these systems.
Evidence from Sources:
Systemic Issues: There's a clear perception among some that both CPS and family courts have systemic issues that can lead to corruption or at least the appearance of it. PARENTALRIGHTS.ORG | Fight Corrupted Family Courts & CPS | ICCACK
Investigations and Lawsuits: There are references to investigations and lawsuits aimed at addressing these issues, suggesting some level of formal acknowledgment or response to these concerns. Lobbyist for Citizens | Medical Kidnapping
Public Outcry: Posts on Social Media and various online forums show significant public outcry and personal stories of perceived injustice by these institutions.
Human Trafficking via Foster Care
Human trafficking via foster care is a deeply concerning issue where children within the foster care system become vulnerable to exploitation, including sex trafficking and labor trafficking. Here are key points based on available information:
Vulnerability Factors:
Lack of Stable Support: Children in foster care often lack a stable, supportive family environment, making them more susceptible to the false promises or manipulation by traffickers who offer affection, a sense of belonging, or basic needs like food and shelter.
History of Trauma: Many children in foster care have already experienced trauma, abuse, or neglect, which traffickers can exploit, knowing that these children might be looking for stability or might not recognize abusive behavior as abnormal.
Frequent Moves and Runaway Episodes: Frequent changes in placement can disrupt a child's sense of security, leading some to run away, where they are at a higher risk of being trafficked. Runaway episodes are statistically linked to an increased likelihood of trafficking victimization.
Evidence from Research and Reports:
High Proportion of Trafficking Victims: According to various studies, a significant percentage of children identified as trafficking victims have been involved with the foster care system. For instance, it's been reported that up to 60% of child sex trafficking victims have a history in foster care.
Specific Cases and Data: There have been documented cases where children in foster care were trafficked by foster parents, other foster youth, or even social workers. Group homes, where supervision might be less personal, are particularly noted as recruitment sites. ATI | Stateline
Systemic Failures: There are criticisms regarding the child welfare system's response to trafficking, including failures in screening children for trafficking risks upon return from being missing, inadequate oversight of group homes, and insufficient training for those working in child welfare to recognize trafficking signs.
Measures and Recommendations:
Screening and Training: Enhanced screening mechanisms for children who go missing from foster care, along with better training for foster parents, social workers, and law enforcement to identify trafficking risks and signs.
Policy and Legislative Reforms: Calls for policy changes to reduce the number of children in foster care, improve the quality of care, and ensure that foster homes are safe environments. The focus is on prevention by keeping families together where possible through support services.
Public Awareness and Advocacy: There's an ongoing effort to raise public awareness about the issue, emphasizing the need for community involvement, like becoming a mentor or a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) for foster children.
Voices for Children
Social Media Sentiment: Social media posts highlight a public perception that links foster care with human trafficking, often with strong language like "government-sponsored trafficking" or "state-sponsored human trafficking," indicating a deep-seated mistrust or concern about the system's integrity.
MAXIMUS, INC & FAMILY COURT CORRUPTION
Maximus, Inc., primarily known for its services in government health and human services programs, has been linked to family court systems through its involvement in various child welfare and support services. Here's how this connection manifests:
Role in Child Welfare:
Service Provision: Maximus has contracts with several government agencies to assist with child welfare programs, including support for child support enforcement, case management, and services aimed at improving outcomes for children and families. Their activities can range from managing calls centers for child support inquiries to providing support for eligibility determination for various welfare programs.
System Implementation: They've been involved in the implementation of Comprehensive Child Welfare Information Systems (CCWIS), which are intended to streamline and modernize state child welfare operations, ensuring better tracking and management of child welfare cases.
Controversies and Criticisms:
Allegations of Mismanagement: There have been instances where Maximus has been criticized for inefficiencies or mismanagement in their operations. For example, in some states, there have been complaints about delays or errors in child support payments facilitated by Maximus.
Legal Challenges: Maximus has faced legal actions related to its services. For instance, they've been part of lawsuits concerning improper billing practices or inadequate service delivery in child welfare contexts. One notable case was a settlement with the U.S. government for $30.5 million in 2007 over allegations of causing the District of Columbia to submit false Medicaid claims for children in foster care.
Public Perception: Social media and watchdog groups sometimes highlight Maximus in discussions about the privatization of child welfare services, expressing concerns over profit motives potentially overshadowing child welfare. Posts on platforms like numerous social media accounts have suggested connections between Maximus and what they describe as systemic issues in family courts or child protective services, though these claims often lack detailed substantiation.
Specific Instances:
Illinois Contract: Maximus has been awarded contracts in states like Illinois for handling aspects of Medicaid and welfare programs, which indirectly touches on family court matters through welfare-to-work programs or support services for families.
Wisconsin's W-2 Program: They've managed parts of Wisconsin's welfare-to-work program (W-2), which involves supporting families moving from welfare to employment, a process that can interact with family court decisions regarding child support and custody.
Considerations:
Complex Role: While Maximus provides services that can affect family court outcomes, their direct influence on judicial decisions is limited unless a judge bases rulings on information provided by Maximus (like child support calculations). The company's role is more about administrative support to government agencies.
Need for Oversight: Given the sensitive nature of child welfare, any private company's involvement, including Maximus, requires rigorous oversight to ensure services are delivered ethically and effectively.
Reform Discussions: The involvement of private companies in public services like child welfare often sparks debates about privatization, with calls for greater transparency, accountability, and sometimes, re-nationalization of these services to ensure they are handled with the public good as the primary focus.
Judicial Trafficking of Illegal Alien Children
"Judicial trafficking of illegal alien children" is not a formally recognized term in legal or academic discourse but appears to be a colloquial or critical expression aimed at describing what some perceive as systemic failures or corruption within the judicial and child welfare systems concerning unaccompanied minors who enter the United States. Here's an analysis of the related concerns:
Background:
Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC): These are children who enter the U.S. without a legal guardian. Upon arrival, they are placed under the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) until they can be released to a sponsor or enter into removal proceedings.
Issues and Allegations:
Inadequate Vetting of Sponsors:
There have been allegations that the vetting process for sponsors of UACs is insufficient, potentially leading to children being placed with individuals who might exploit them. This concern has been raised by various reports and whistleblowers, suggesting that some children might end up in situations akin to trafficking due to poor oversight or corruption.
Disappearance of Children:
Numerous reports and posts on social media accounts indicate that a significant number of UACs have gone missing after being released to sponsors. This has led to speculation and concern that some of these children might be victims of trafficking or forced labor, though concrete evidence directly linking this to judicial actions is sparse.
Judicial Decisions and Policies:
Critics argue that certain judicial decisions, like those influenced by the Flores Settlement Agreement or interpretations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), might inadvertently facilitate the exploitation of children by limiting the time they can be held or by making it challenging to deport them quickly.
Lack of Follow-Up:
There's criticism regarding the follow-up once children are released to sponsors, with some saying that the system loses track of these children, thereby potentially enabling trafficking or abuse.
Specific Points from Sources:
Judicial Watch Reports: Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, has been vocal about what they describe as "trafficking" facilitated by HHS policies under the Biden administration, pointing to documents they've obtained through lawsuits showing children being transported across states without proper oversight.
Government Audits and Investigations: Federal audits have highlighted failures in monitoring children post-release, with tens of thousands not receiving notices to appear in court or not being tracked after being placed with sponsors, raising alarms about their welfare.
Judicial Watch Link 1 | Judicial Watch Link 2 | ABC News | Homeland Security Committee | Republican | Senator Chuck Grassley | House GOP
Public and Political Concerns: There's significant public discourse, often reflected in posts on Social Media Accounts, where concerns about the safety and whereabouts of UACs are raised, sometimes framing these issues in terms of "judicial trafficking" to emphasize the perceived role of legal and judicial systems in these outcomes.
Conclusion: While the term "judicial trafficking" might be inflammatory or oversimplified, the underlying concerns about the welfare, tracking, and potential exploitation of unaccompanied alien children in the U.S. are serious. These issues involve complex interactions between immigration law, child welfare, judicial oversight, and policy implementation. The discussions around this topic often call for:
Tighter vetting of sponsors.
Improved tracking and follow-up mechanisms.
Reforms in how immigration courts handle UAC cases.
Greater transparency and accountability in how these children are managed once they enter the U.S. system.
However, addressing these issues requires a nuanced understanding of both policy and practice, ensuring that the rights and safety of children are prioritized while navigating the complexities of immigration law and international child welfare.
Even as of late within the first full week of President, Trump’s second term serious breaking news hits about the Department of Homeland Security under Mayorkas and the former administration (Biden).
BREAKING: The Trump Administration has Reportedly located 75-80k of the 340k missing migrant children
If the Trump Administration can find so many kids after only 4 days in office….
“What in the world has Biden’s administration doing? What was Mayorkas doing when he said they don’t know where those kids are.”
🔴 QUESTIONS • Where were they? Where are they now? What else?
FULL VIDEO: RUMBLE LINK
The Wrap Up:
These are no trivial issues that can be brushed to the side. We must address these issues head-on with full force of both morality and law. This article is just the first in a series. We will continue to expose and to shed light on these matters. Human Trafficking of all sorts is real but what’s worse is when your own State and Federal Courts have an engaged-involved hand in all of it. There are There are some within fighting alongside of many trusted organizations like SOC Save Our Children. We must support them but not the ones who are fighting against Our Children to be trafficked into harmful hands.
Other Human Trafficking Information:
JUDICIAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING The Realities of Corruption (in all 50 States)
Sat. Jan. 25, 2025 FEN Free Eagle Network w/ SOC Save Our Children
FEN & SOC OFFICIAL LINKS: https://linktr.ee/fenlinkinbio
Had the CPS and Adac do this to me and my family